Next: Foreign Functions, Up: Foreign Function Interface [Contents][Index]
Most modern Unices have something called shared libraries. This ordinarily means that they have the capability to share the executable image of a library between several running programs to save memory and disk space. But generally, shared libraries give a lot of additional flexibility compared to the traditional static libraries. In fact, calling them ‘dynamic’ libraries is as correct as calling them ‘shared’.
Shared libraries really give you a lot of flexibility in addition to the memory and disk space savings. When you link a program against a shared library, that library is not closely incorporated into the final executable. Instead, the executable of your program only contains enough information to find the needed shared libraries when the program is actually run. Only then, when the program is starting, is the final step of the linking process performed. This means that you need not recompile all programs when you install a new, only slightly modified version of a shared library. The programs will pick up the changes automatically the next time they are run.
Now, when all the necessary machinery is there to perform part of the linking at run-time, why not take the next step and allow the programmer to explicitly take advantage of it from within their program? Of course, many operating systems that support shared libraries do just that, and chances are that Guile will allow you to access this feature from within your Scheme programs. As you might have guessed already, this feature is called dynamic linking.20
We titled this section “foreign libraries” because although the name “foreign” doesn’t leak into the API, the world of C really is foreign to Scheme – and that estrangement extends to components of foreign libraries as well, as we see in future sections.
Find the shared library denoted by library (a string) and link it into the running Guile application. When everything works out, return a Scheme object suitable for representing the linked object file. Otherwise an error is thrown. How object files are searched is system dependent.
Guile first tries to load library as the absolute file name of a shared library. If that fails, it then falls back to interpret library as just the name of some shared library that will be searched for in the places where shared libraries usually reside, such as /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib.
library should not contain an extension such as .so
, unless
library represents the absolute file name to the shared library. The
correct file name extension for the host operating system is provided
automatically, according to libltdl’s rules (see lt_dlopenext
in Shared Library Support for
GNU).
When library is omitted, a global symbol handle is returned. This handle provides access to the symbols available to the program at run-time, including those exported by the program itself and the shared libraries already loaded.
Note that on hosts that use dynamic-link libraries (DLLs), the global symbol handle may not be able to provide access to symbols from recursively-loaded DLLs. Only exported symbols from those DLLs directly loaded by the program may be available.
Return #t
if obj is a dynamic library handle, or #f
otherwise.
Unlink the indicated object file from the application. The
argument dobj must have been obtained by a call to
dynamic-link
. After dynamic-unlink
has been
called on dobj, its content is no longer accessible.
(define libgl-obj (dynamic-link "libGL")) libgl-obj ⇒ #<dynamic-object "libGL"> (dynamic-unlink libGL-obj) libGL-obj ⇒ #<dynamic-object "libGL" (unlinked)>
As you can see, after calling dynamic-unlink
on a dynamically
linked library, it is marked as ‘(unlinked)’ and you are no longer
able to use it with dynamic-call
, etc. Whether the library is
really removed from you program is system-dependent and will generally
not happen when some other parts of your program still use it.
When dynamic linking is disabled or not supported on your system, the above functions throw errors, but they are still available.
Some people also refer to the final linking stage at program startup as ‘dynamic linking’, so if you want to make yourself perfectly clear, it is probably best to use the more technical term dlopening, as suggested by Gordon Matzigkeit in his libtool documentation.
Next: Foreign Functions, Up: Foreign Function Interface [Contents][Index]